A decommissioning escrow serves as a segregated, ring‑fenced bank account, managed by an independent escrow agent or trustee, to ensure that money is securely available for decommissioning or site restoration at the appropriate time. In contrast to bonds, which provide assurance through a third-party guarantee (like a policy of insurance), escrows offer direct access to cash held in trust, delivering greater transparency, control and liquidity for all stakeholders.
In practice, a decommissioning escrow operates by holding project-specific money in a dedicated account, accessible only under clearly defined conditions. Release will typically occur upon the occurrence of trigger events such as operator insolvency, failure to meet contractual obligations, or formal approval of a decommissioning plan.
Unlike bonds, which are commonly structured as on-demand instruments such as letters of credit and require enforcement through a third party, escrows provide immediate access to pre-funded cash, held by a neutral party. This direct arrangement avoids reliance on external credit, performance guarantees or insurer solvency.
By safeguarding escrow funds through a regulated payment institution, the escrow agent's own insolvency also ceases to be a concern as the cash will remain available to the underlying parties in the event of the escrow agent's insolvency.
Bonds, while widely used, introduce potential for delay, enforcement risk, and credit deterioration over time. They often depend on a third party’s (the bond issuer's) ongoing financial health and may require legal action to draw upon in the event of dispute or default.
Escrows, by contrast, avoid these issues by requiring the funds are already deposited, clearly ring-fenced, and accessible based on objective pre-agreed criteria. This level of certainty is particularly valuable in sectors with long-tail liabilities, where the costs of decommissioning may not materialise for decades, but must nevertheless be securely provisioned for in the present.
Although commonly proposed, parent company guarantees rarely meet the stringent standards required for statutory decommissioning security. They are often revocable or contingent upon the parent’s financial position, and may not be enforceable in cases of insolvency.
For this reason, UK regulators typically exclude them from the list of acceptable instruments for securing decommissioning obligations. Escrow offers a more robust alternative, with irrevocable segregation of funds and a clearly defined legal trust structure, ensuring independence from the operator’s corporate group.
Decommissioning escrows are widely used in industries where projects give rise to restoration or environmental liabilities that must be addressed at the end of a project’s life.
The most prominent examples in the UK include offshore oil and gas installations, offshore renewables such as wind farms, and onshore wind. These sectors are typically subject to statutory requirements for decommissioning, and this form of assurance is often mandated by regulatory authorities to ensure that costs can be met even if the operator defaults or ceases to trade.
In the UK context, it is typically the developer or licence holder who contributes to the escrow, with the funds held for the benefit of one or more named beneficiaries.
These beneficiaries may include the Secretary of State, Scottish Ministers, relevant landowners, or co-venturers.
The role of the escrow agent like us is to hold the funds neutrally, administer the agreement in accordance with its terms, and release money only when defined conditions are met. The escrow structure ensures that funds are protected, insulated from insolvency, and legally ring-fenced for the specific purpose of decommissioning.
UK government guidance, particularly in the context of oil and gas, lists escrow accounts as an acceptable and often preferable form of decommissioning security.
The Offshore Petroleum Regulator for Environment and Decommissioning ('OPRED') has published detailed Financial Assurance Guidance, which explicitly supports the use of escrow accounts within Decommissioning Security Agreements.
Similarly, the Energy Act 2004 governs security for offshore renewable energy installations, with guidance from both Westminster and devolved administrations confirming that escrow is a suitable mechanism for compliance.
Funding levels are generally calculated using a cost-based model that reflects the anticipated expenses of decommissioning, adjusted for inflation, contingency and risk. These calculations are typically undertaken by an independent expert, often retained or approved by the relevant authority. It is common for a risk uplift to be included, generally ranging from 10 to 30 percent, to give comfort that the escrow remains adequate in the face of potential cost overruns or unforeseen site conditions.
Decommissioning escrows can be funded in a single upfront contribution, or through a staged profile that builds over time.
Staged contributions are especially common in projects with long operational lifespans, allowing developers to manage cash flow more effectively.
Risk uplifts ensure the fund accounts for operational uncertainty, fluctuating market rates, environmental obligations, and inflationary effects, thereby safeguarding against underfunding when decommissioning becomes necessary.
Escrow agreements typically include a regular review mechanism, annually or at other agreed intervals, where the adequacy of the fund is reassessed in light of updated cost forecasts or regulatory requirements.
Release of funds requires strict adherence to the escrow conditions, with objective evidence required to demonstrate the occurrence of a qualifying trigger.
This may include the formal approval of a decommissioning programme, regulatory demand for works, or verification that the developer has defaulted. In some frameworks, funds released from other security instruments (such as letters of credit or bonds) are swept into the escrow to be used under the same controls.
OPRED’s Financial Assurance Guidance confirms that decommissioning escrows are acceptable under Decommissioning Security Agreements, provided that they are independently managed, ring-fenced, and governed by appropriate legal terms. This allows the Secretary of State to rely on the availability of funds when required, while providing developers with flexibility in managing their obligations over time.
The Energy Act 2004 requires developers of offshore renewable energy projects to submit a decommissioning programme, supported by appropriate financial security.
Government guidance in this area, both from the UK and devolved administrations, recognises escrow accounts as compliant mechanisms.
In the onshore sector, the use of escrow accounts has also been documented. For example, NatureScot’s case study on the Windy Standard wind farm demonstrates how funds were held in escrow with drawdown rights granted to the landowner in the event of operator non-performance.
Although historically most common in oil, gas and renewables, other infrastructure and industrial sectors are beginning to adopt decommissioning escrow arrangements. Waste management, transportation infrastructure, and extractive industries increasingly face regulatory scrutiny and long-term restoration liabilities.
As a result, stakeholders in these sectors are exploring escrow frameworks as a flexible, transparent alternative to traditional bonds or insurance-based guarantees.
Escrows offer developers greater flexibility in managing funding schedules and more predictable treatment of their obligations. They also reduce reliance on volatile credit markets or expensive third-party insurance products.
Because funds are drawn only when defined conditions are met, developers retain a measure of control and visibility over the security, without compromising regulatory compliance.
From a stakeholder perspective, escrow accounts offer the comfort of knowing that restoration obligations are financially covered, regardless of the developer’s future solvency.
Funds held in escrow cannot be accessed for other purposes, and are typically structured to allow drawdown by the beneficiary in clearly defined circumstances. This builds trust in the project’s long-term environmental commitments and aligns with broader policy objectives around sustainability and responsible asset stewardship.
The most important provisions include precise definitions of drawdown triggers, clear investment protocols for funds held, and annual review mechanisms to ensure adequacy.
Compliance with applicable regulatory standards, whether through OPRED, the Energy Act or devolved equivalents, must also be reflected in the documentation.
Escrow agreements should detail rights of access, audit, reporting, and dispute resolution, ensuring that all parties understand their roles and obligations. We are well placed to serve as your impartial escrow agent, offering expertly managed arrangements that balance legal precision with commercial pragmatism.
Decommissioning escrow is a compelling alternative to traditional bonding. It provides transparency, legal certainty and financial efficiency, particularly when used in conjunction with regulatory guidance and best practice protocols.
Whether applied to oil and gas, renewables, or other infrastructure projects, escrow structures enable developers, landowners and public bodies to manage risk in a way that is both compliant and commercially astute.
Engaging a trusted, experienced escrow agent is a crucial step in structuring effective and reliable long-term security.
.png)
.png)
dospay is a trading name of DOS & Co. Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 08294966.
DOS & Co. Ltd. is registered with the Financial Conduct Authority under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 (FRN: 833374) for the provision of payment services.
All of our GBP escrow and third-party managed accounts are segregated and safeguarded at the Bank of England.
